/cm:retroCampaign/sprint retrospective
/cm:retro — Campaign / Sprint Retrospective
Structured post-mortem for campaigns, launches, or sprints.
What It Does
A deeper analysis than /cm:compound. While compound captures quick learnings, retro does a full post-mortem: what happened, why it happened, what to change. Best run after campaigns, launches, or sprint cycles.
Time Investment
20-30 minutes
Process
1. Set the Scope
- What are we reviewing? (Campaign name, sprint #, launch, experiment)
- What was the timeline? (Start → end)
- What was the original goal?
- What was the actual outcome?
2. Results vs. Expectations
| Metric | Target | Actual | Delta | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Primary metric] | ... | ... | ... | 🟢/🟡/🔴 |
| [Secondary metric] | ... | ... | ... | 🟢/🟡/🔴 |
| [Secondary metric] | ... | ... | ... | 🟢/🟡/🔴 |
Overall: Did we hit the goal? Why or why not?
3. What Worked (Keep Doing)
List things that went well. Be specific — not "content was good" but "the comparison blog post drove 340 signups at $2.40 CAC."
For each:
- What specifically worked?
- Why did it work?
- How can we do more of this?
- Can this be systematized?
4. What Didn't Work (Stop Doing)
List things that failed or underperformed. No blame — just facts.
For each:
- What happened?
- Why didn't it work? (Root cause, not surface)
- How much time/money was spent?
- Should we try again differently, or kill it?
5. What We'd Change (Start Doing)
Based on the above:
- What would we do differently if we ran this again?
- What new approach should we try?
- What process changes would improve execution?
6. Surprises & Insights
Things you didn't expect — both good and bad:
- Unexpected channel that worked
- Audience segment that responded differently
- Content format that surprised
- Timing or sequencing insight
7. Action Items
Concrete next steps:
| Action | Owner | Deadline | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|
| [Action] | [Who] | [When] | High/Med/Low |
| ... | ... | ... | ... |
8. Compound the Learnings
Run `/cm:compound` to document:
- Key insights worth keeping
- Patterns to remember
- Frameworks to reuse
- Data points for future decisions
Output
## Retro: [Campaign/Sprint Name] — [Date]
### Summary
[1-2 sentence summary of what happened]
### Scorecard
| Metric | Target | Actual | Verdict |
|--------|--------|--------|---------|
| ... | ... | ... | ... |
### Keep (What Worked)
1. ...
2. ...
### Stop (What Didn't Work)
1. ...
2. ...
### Start (What to Change)
1. ...
2. ...
### Key Insight
[The single most important thing we learned]
### Action Items
1. ...
2. ...When to Run
- After every campaign ends
- At sprint boundaries (end of 2-week sprint)
- After product launches (1-2 weeks post-launch)
- After A/B tests conclude
- After any significant marketing initiative
Related Workflows
/cm:compound— Quick learning capture (use for small tasks)/cm:sprint— Sprint planning (retro feeds into next sprint)/cm:weekly— Weekly review (smaller scope than retro)/cm:audit— Quarterly audit (bigger scope than retro)
Common Mistakes
- Skipping the retro (most common — and most costly)
- Making it about blame (it's about learning, not fault-finding)
- Not capturing action items (retro without actions is just venting)
- Doing it too late (memory fades — run within 1 week of campaign end)
- Not reading previous retros before planning new work
Install Compounding Marketing and use it with Claude Code, ChatGPT, or Cursor.
Get Started →